Views Of Matter Essay -- essays research papers fc

What ex act asly is outcome, it is not an every day straits that maven asks ones own self. When looked at there be many disparate views on this subject, however because of the numerous numbers of contrary views, it is only possible to look at three of the discourses. The three discourses of bailiwick to be looked at are the Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical. Each discourse has evolved through quantify into the views that we know, and accept today. The distinction in the midst of these views on matter differs greatly, however it is possible to say that all three views came from the same place. This place being antediluvian Greece it was their belief in gods that brought about religion, philosophy, and then science.The scientific view of matter has evolved over time. learning for many centuries has been accompanied by philosophical thought, passim time the mixture of the two is very evident. The beginnings of western science, namely physics, admit with that of the first period of classical philosophers. Physics is in fact a term derived from the Greek word physis which means the endeavor of seeing the all-important(a) nature of all things (Capra, 1977, p. 9). The basic ideas evolved from the Greek philosophers, and philosophy remained a macro part of science right up until the northwardian view of the universe.Newton had a mechanistic view of the universe. He saw the universe as a three dimensional space. This space was unchangeable and always stagnant. In Newtons own words, Absolute space, in its own nature, without heed to anything external, remains always similar and immovable. All changes in the physical origination were described in terms of a separate dimension, called time, which again was absolute, having no connection to the material world and flowing smoothly, from the past through the benefaction to the future. (Capra, 1977, p. 43). The things, which made up the absolute space and time, were material particles. These were pe rceived by Newton to be a part of all matter, as intimately as indestructible. Newtons views were very parallel to those of the early Greek atomists. Both were based on the distinction between the full and the void, between matter and space, and in both models the particles remained always identical in their good deal and shape. (Capra, 1977, p. 43). The difference between these two views came in the forces that acted upon the particles. The early Greeks... ...nce.Thus the different views on matter are 1. piety God created All matter. 2. scientific discipline All matter is made up of tiny particles, (molecules/atoms) which have forces that act upon them to create movement. 3. Philosophy Questions the mankind of matter (what is real?) and shows why it exists if therefore it does. Religion is mystical and is supernatural, and believes that God has created all matter. Science got its beginnings from early philosophers, except when philosophers moved away from the question of wha t is something made of, to the question of does it exist? Science still tried to prove our existence, through what matter is made of. Religion and philosophy differ in that religion has an answer to the question of the existence of matter. This is the same for science it has proved that there are tiny particles called atoms that shit up every thing. So of the three discourses, philosophy is the only one still searching for an answer to the question of the existence of matter. BibliographyCapra, Fritjof. The Tao of physics. Bantam Books, Toronto, 1977.Russell, B. The worry of philosophy. A Galaxy Book, New York, 1959.Durkhiem, E. Elementary focus of the religious life.