Discourse with an Atheist Who Beleives That Gos Does Not Exist Essay

Discourse with an Atheist Who Beleives That Gos Does Not live - Essay ExampleFor instance, evolution does not explain the forces that combined the hydrogen and oxygen molecules and dust particles to homunculus the primordial cell. Likewise, the causes and reacting elements that triggered the Big have it off or the stars withdrawal of elements from the sun, as is alleged in the Star-Tidal theory ar not cogently identified in non- fundamentist theories. Even non-creationist theories have to take a natural spring of faith in investigating the origin of life forms (Mongrain, 2011, 205). Contrary to the above, no one can repudiate the fact that the world, the universe and life forms are too complex to have been brought about by hit-or-miss chance. The intricate network of the blood vessels in mammals (especially man), the oecumenic order and mans linguistic capabilities, are just some of the indicators of an intelligent Being who must have designed the universe. Had the Star-Tidal or the Big Bang incident brought the universe and life forms into existence, chances for this striking order would be zero (1/?). Logically, if idol exists, then His interactions with His creation will be inevitable, and the vestiges of these interactions may also be notable. Still, these requirements are consistent with the Biblical notion of immortals existence. Particularly, there are indicators of the universal or the Noahic flood, just as the Bible alleges that the flood took say around 4,300 BC. For instance, the multiple sources and traditions of the worldwide deluge as is seen in the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Rig Veda and Ovids metabolism and the Chineses Book of Knowledge, among others provide the Noahic flood with multiple attestations. Particularly, there are over 240 literature and traditions which mention the worldwide flood. The slight disparities among the accounts do not really discount the plausibility of a universal flood having taken place. Instead, the numerou s accounts corroborate it. 2) A case for the Nazarene claim to be God and for His resurrection That Jesus claimed to be God is directly settled in many references. Some of these references include Matthew 126-8 (He refers to Himself as the Initiator of the Sabbath) Mark 21, 2, 10 (He forgives sins) Matthew 721-23 (He is the ultimate Judge who can render pure(a) damnation) Mathew 1433 and John 938 (He accepts worship). Conversely, Christs claim to be God is expressly seen in the instance where He takes up Gods name and therefore par Himself with God, in John 823-4. In Exodus 312-14, God reveals Himself to Moses, with the name I AM. In His discourse with the Pharisees and the rest of the Jews, Jesus does not alone claim to have preceded Abraham, but also takes on the name I AM (Williams, 2010, 27). In Mark 21, 2 and 10, before healing a paralytic, Jesus speaks of having forgiven the young mans sins. The Scribes and those gathered there charged (rightly) in their hearts that only G od had the power to forgive sins. To validate His claim of having the power to forgive sins, Jesus heals the paralytic. The crux of the subject field herein is that while it is easy for any one to claim to have the power to forgive sins, He healed the paralytic as proof to His ability to forgive sins. Logically, a mans nomenclature just before his death are usually taken seriously, especially when the actor or talker is aware that he is on the brink of death. At this instance, an individual weighs his words and deeds carefully because of the cognition of the irreversible nature of death and the eternal state that