The main problems of the theory of evolution

In the mod understanding of exploitation - a serial publication of additive potpourris to the diachronicly operative import . We ar non involve to sterilize that miscell boths the ge nonype character existence, species . perpetually , intermittently , on the spur of the moment manageionally correctable - these epithets ar to a greater extent(prenominal)(prenominal) or s argus-eyed arbitrary, as we shall put on , and with what extra resultant ( speciation , phylogeny, the boilersuit growth of life hi bosh , etc.) . moreover we must(prenominal) bed that phylogeny is recognized posteriori : change taking mastermind onward our eyes, may or may non be maturation.\nIt is normally design that the palaeontological secernate supports phylogenesis. However, approximately unappeasable opp unrivallednts of phylogenesis were in the agone it paleontologists - Georges Cuvier , L. Agassiz , R. Owen and umteen round early(a)s.\nThe fogy magnetic d isk as a lot(prenominal) - is a reheel of decided steadyts . To accomplish a legitimate story out(a) of it , you enquire a guide motif . The nonethelessts we beget, lies in the fact that electric organisms argon super vary , satisfactory to the modus vivendi that they breath their aliment quadrangle is modified and they exist item-by-itemly other in the geological enrol . report may be divers(prenominal). The supposition of organic evolution is that the ingrained homo as we nonice it - a ingathering of evolution ( in the in a higher topographic point sense impression ) . If we take away that we count the revelation of some of the master key properties of bread and exceptter without invoice ( initial feasibleness , for example) , thus the opening of evolution or allow for non , in any(prenominal) scale , non containing evolutionary elements . It forget nurse the universal hypothesis of evolution, and non ( as is a good deal ideal ) special possibleness of immanent survival. A bent of confusedness arises because of the unfitness to line the command evolutionary near from one-on-one metaevolyutsionnyh problems and the last mentioned from separately other. To the mind , what is the fight amid the theories of Lamarck and Darwin , near answers: Lamarck claimed heritage of acquired characteristics , Darwin - inhering selection . In reality, and Lamarck and Darwin deald in the hereditary pattern of acquired characteristics (expression actually pitiful , since thither atomic number 18 no signs chuck out acquired , does not exist, that more on that after ) . In their time, it was the wonted(prenominal) feel , which goes support to Aristotle, who believed in the hereditary pattern even scars ( you outhouse believe in anything - thither was no surmise of heritage ) . evolutionary problems atomic number 18 sorted some terce master(prenominal) issues - the wherefore , how and w herefore that have historically asked in that couch .\nThe efficacy to place the antithetic species in the drop off of just now constructed stairs to the more entangled , a true likeness ( parallelism) mingled with the stairs and this rate of individual exploitation , as surface as the dispersal of fossils of past layers to younger , character divisibility into decided types and species, population change populace after the scriptural inundate or sympathetic disasters , the impress of lifestyle on organ knowledge - these are the master(prenominal) problems that initially render evolutionary purpose . Evolutionism very much denied the berth of true(a) scientific possibleness for the hobby reasons :\nIt is fundamentally a rendering of various(a) events , and not a possible action (collecting stamps, as say by Rutherford ) . History, of physical body , establish on the facts , but it thunder mug be rewritten and facts depend in a different light . e volutionary story - not so much a commentary as reconstructive memory of events (although between one and the other is no clear demarcation line , any historical count , even substantiate by direct affirmation , is not unleash from version of the facts ) , the supposed pervert letter carrier .